MISSING SCRIPT · CANCER EVIDENCE REPOSITORY
Evidence Explorer
Natural approaches. Clear questions. Evidence you can examine.
Explore research on nutrition, movement, mind–body care, natural products and other supportive approaches—starting with cancer. Follow each question from the clinical setting to the study, its result and what remains uncertain.
109 evidence records
33 existing reviews + 76 evidence briefs
394 distinct source links
Papers, guidance & supporting resources
7 cancer-specific routes
Plus cross-cancer supportive care
Search covers the whole site. For a focused route, choose an index below.
Start with your question
01 · APPROACH
Interventions A–Z
Look up an ingredient, practice or supportive treatment. Compare its goal, research setting, evidence and limitations.
02 · EVERYDAY LIFE
Symptoms & supportive care
Browse fatigue, nausea, sleep, pain, neuropathy, nutrition and other concerns.
03 · DIAGNOSIS
Browse by cancer
Find the reviews connected to a cancer type, then check the treatment and stage studied.
04 · CANCER OUTCOMES
Cancer-control research
Examine recurrence, tumor response and survival claims separately from symptom relief.
05 · ORIGINAL EVIDENCE
Studies & sources
Trace a statement back to its paper, guideline or source document. Read beyond the headline.
06 · RISK
Safety & interactions
Check documented harms, treatment interactions and the details that can change a decision.
What makes a record trustworthy?
Every record connects an approach to a defined clinical question. Evidence descriptions sit alongside the population, study design, limitations, safety notes and sources. A positive result for one symptom does not establish that an approach treats cancer.
Two ways to use the collection
For people affected by cancer
Begin with a symptom or diagnosis. Open the full record, note whether the study matches your situation, and take its safety questions to your oncology team.
For researchers and critical readers
Begin with a clinical question. Trace the original source, check the comparator and primary endpoint, examine effect size and uncertainty, and look for conflicting results.
Start Here: a practical guide to data analysis and critical scientific thinking →
New in the repository
Sixteen source-linked briefs extend the collection into commonly searched natural-product claims, supportive care and documented risks.
- Acupuncture for AI joint pain
- Massage for palliative cancer pain
- Hypnosis for procedural pain
- Tai chi and qigong for fatigue
- Peppermint aromatherapy for nausea
- Cannabinoids for refractory chemotherapy nausea
- CoQ10 for cancer-related fatigue
- Clinical hypnosis for hot flashes
- Creatine for cancer-related wasting
- Topical diclofenac for capecitabine hand–foot syndrome
Follow the evidence, including when it disappoints
A defined cancer outcome
Read a randomized trial in its specific setting, with recurrence and survival outcomes clearly identified.
A supportive-care question
Check the primary endpoint, the later time point and how guidance weighs the evidence.
A negative finding matters
Vitamin B6 for hand–foot syndrome
A plausible idea can fail in clinical testing. Keep negative results and harms in view.
What does “natural” mean in this collection?
The scope includes plant-derived products, nutrients, diets, exercise, mind–body practices and supportive physical care. Some records cover clinical devices or conventional comparators; their families are labeled in the index. Origin alone does not establish effectiveness or safety.
Does an entry mean an approach works or cures cancer?
No. Inclusion means there is a question to examine. The collection includes supportive findings, mixed or negative results, investigational approaches and evidence of harm. Cure claims require appropriate human evidence; laboratory activity and symptom improvement answer different questions.
How complete is this repository?
The first structured release was compiled October 11, 2026. The repository now indexes 33 existing Missing Script reviews and 56 dedicated evidence briefs (89 records total). The 328 deduplicated source links are supporting references, not a count of distinct clinical trials. Existing citations have been indexed; they have not all received a fresh independent appraisal.
Our goal is to build one of the most useful, transparent repositories of evidence on natural approaches. Current coverage is selective. Dated literature-search and repository maintenance began October 13, 2026. Verified additions and revisions will carry source-check dates; unresolved findings will be held for further checking. This process does not provide comprehensive interaction checking or formal independent clinical sign-off.
Use evidence to ask better questions. This resource supports research and conversations with qualified clinicians. It does not provide a personal treatment plan. Review supplements, restrictive diets and other interventions with your oncology team before changing care.
Browse the evidence · Check the sources · Understand the standards
Evidence Updates
See the dated record of new entries, revisions, safety changes and coverage limits on the Evidence Updates page.
Added October 14, 2026
Ten new clinical-question records broaden the nutrition, supportive-care and cancer-control coverage. Three records document important null cancer-control findings, and the high-dose vitamin D record transparently places the new phase III result beside the earlier phase II signal.
- Individualized dietary counseling during radiotherapy — positive randomized signal / practical guidance.
- Neutropenic diets during leukemia treatment and stem-cell transplant — no demonstrated infection-prevention benefit.
- Soy foods after breast cancer — observationally reassuring; whole foods are not isoflavone supplements.
- Perioperative immunonutrition for gastrointestinal cancer surgery — positive randomized signal, formulation-specific.
- High-dose vitamin D with chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer — phase III found no progression-free or overall-survival benefit.
- High-vegetable diet during prostate-cancer active surveillance — no demonstrated progression benefit despite changed eating behavior.
- Selenium during pelvic radiotherapy — small randomized diarrhea signal limited to documented deficiency and supervised dosing.
- Photobiomodulation for oral mucositis — positive randomized mucositis signal, protocol-specific.
- Self-acupressure for persistent fatigue after breast cancer — positive randomized fatigue signal; symptom support, not cancer treatment.
- Pomegranate products for prostate-cancer progression — placebo-controlled studies did not demonstrate cancer-control benefit.
Added October 15, 2026
Ten botanical and nutraceutical clinical-question records add negative, mixed, positive and harmful findings. The strongest safety signal is the stopped GENIUS phase III trial of Goshajinkigan, where grade 2 or worse oxaliplatin neuropathy was more frequent with the Kampo formula.
- Black cohosh for hot flashes after breast cancer — phase III found no benefit beyond placebo; liver and product-quality cautions.
- Guarana for cancer-related fatigue — conflicting small trials and heterogeneous meta-analyses.
- Chamomile mouthwash for treatment-related oral mucositis — the largest placebo-controlled trial was negative; smaller later signals remain uncertain.
- Calendula ointment for breast-radiotherapy skin reactions — positive older randomized signal against trolamine, formulation-specific.
- Aloe vera gel for radiation dermatitis — conflicting results across radiation sites and products.
- Vitamin E for hot flashes after breast cancer — about one fewer hot flash per day; benefit was clinically minimal.
- Intravenous glutathione to prevent platinum neuropathy — positive small-trial neuropathy signal, insufficient for routine intravenous use.
- Oral L-glutamine for treatment-related oral mucositis — older negative trials and a large 2026 head-and-neck signal; regimen-specific.
- Milk thistle for chemotherapy-associated liver injury — laboratory trends without demonstrated clinical liver benefit.
- Goshajinkigan to prevent oxaliplatin neuropathy — phase III stopped early; neuropathy was more frequent with the Kampo formula.
Exercise and rehabilitation additions — October 16, 2026
Ten records add functional, cognitive, sleep and cancer-control questions. The collection keeps improvements in symptoms or fitness separate from tumor response.
- Structured physiotherapy after breast-cancer surgery — Positive randomized rehabilitation evidence.
- Exercise prehabilitation before head-and-neck chemoradiotherapy — Preliminary positive randomized signal.
- Supervised exercise during neoadjuvant breast chemotherapy — No demonstrated tumor-response benefit.
- Lesion-aware exercise with prostate-cancer bone metastases — Positive functional and supervised-safety signal.
- Aerobic exercise for cognitive changes during breast-cancer chemotherapy — Mixed randomized evidence.
- Aerobic exercise for neuropathy after ovarian-cancer chemotherapy — Promising secondary randomized signal.
- Manual lymph drainage to prevent arm lymphedema after breast surgery — No demonstrated prevention benefit.
- Preventive swallowing exercises during head-and-neck radiotherapy — Mixed evidence.
- Exercise during allogeneic stem-cell transplantation — Small randomized supportive signal.
- Intermittent aerobic exercise for insomnia during breast-cancer chemotherapy — Primary sleep-duration endpoint negative.
Added October 17, 2026
Ten structured mind–body, sleep, and psychosocial supportive-care questions were added after primary-source and duplication checks. None is evidence of tumor control.
- MS-N049 — Music therapy compared with CBT for anxiety in cancer survivors
- MS-N050 — Acupuncture compared with CBT-I for insomnia in cancer survivors
- MS-N051 — Tai Chi Chih compared with CBT-I for insomnia after breast cancer
- MS-N052 — Morning bright light for fatigue during breast-cancer chemotherapy
- MS-N053 — Expressive writing for symptoms and physical quality of life in renal cell carcinoma
- MS-N054 — Mindfulness-based programs for fatigue after breast cancer
- MS-N055 — Yoga during radiotherapy for breast-cancer quality of life
- MS-N056 — Progressive muscle relaxation plus guided imagery for anxiety during chemotherapy
- MS-N057 — Dignity therapy for distress near the end of life
- MS-N058 — Meaning-centered psychotherapy in advanced cancer
New evidence records · October 18, 2026
Ten supportive-care records were added. These additions include positive, mixed and negative primary outcomes; none tested tumor response, recurrence or survival.
- Acupuncture for fatigue after breast-cancer chemotherapy — promising but inconsistent
- Acupuncture for chemotherapy neuropathy — mixed; 2026 primary endpoint negative
- Acupuncture for chronic radiation dry mouth — positive versus oral hygiene; sham contrast time-dependent
- Acupuncture for chronic survivor pain — pragmatic benefit
- Electroacupuncture for hot flashes — promising phase II evidence
- P6 wristbands for chemotherapy nausea — no clear specific benefit
- Reflexology in advanced breast cancer — limited symptom/function signals
- Oral cryotherapy for mucositis prevention — regimen-specific support
- Scalp cooling for chemotherapy hair loss — effective for some regimens
- Frozen gloves and socks for taxane neuropathy — 2026 primary endpoint negative
See the dated Evidence Updates log →
Added October 19, 2026
Ten new records deepen the interaction and unsupported-cure-claim rotation. The repository now contains 109 published records and 394 distinct source links.
- Curcumin supplements with tamoxifen — human pharmacokinetic interaction; no cancer-outcome inference.
- Antioxidant supplements during breast-cancer chemotherapy — concerning observational associations, not causal proof.
- High-dose antioxidant vitamins during head-and-neck radiotherapy — randomized harm signal for a specific formulation.
- Probiotic supplements during immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy — conflicting observational evidence.
- Cannabis use during immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy — conflicting observational evidence; supportive use is separate from cancer control.
- Grapefruit with oral anticancer medicines — drug-specific pharmacokinetic interactions.
- Essiac and Flor Essence as cancer treatments — no reliable human efficacy evidence.
- Gerson therapy and coffee enemas for cancer — unsupported efficacy plus documented serious harms.
- Black salve for suspected or confirmed skin cancer — corrosive injury and failure/delay risks.
- Chlorine dioxide (MMS) as a cancer treatment — no efficacy evidence and potentially fatal toxicity.