Missing ScriptStart HereBlogCountry ExplorerIntegrative Care GuideEvidence ExplorerPodcastAbout

MISSING SCRIPT · CANCER EVIDENCE REPOSITORY

Evidence Explorer

Natural approaches. Clear questions. Evidence you can examine.

Explore research on nutrition, movement, mind–body care, natural products and other supportive approaches—starting with cancer. Follow each question from the clinical setting to the study, its result and what remains uncertain.

109 evidence records
33 existing reviews + 76 evidence briefs

394 distinct source links
Papers, guidance & supporting resources

7 cancer-specific routes
Plus cross-cancer supportive care

Search covers the whole site. For a focused route, choose an index below.

Start with your question

01 · APPROACH

Interventions A–Z

Look up an ingredient, practice or supportive treatment. Compare its goal, research setting, evidence and limitations.

02 · EVERYDAY LIFE

Symptoms & supportive care

Browse fatigue, nausea, sleep, pain, neuropathy, nutrition and other concerns.

03 · DIAGNOSIS

Browse by cancer

Find the reviews connected to a cancer type, then check the treatment and stage studied.

04 · CANCER OUTCOMES

Cancer-control research

Examine recurrence, tumor response and survival claims separately from symptom relief.

05 · ORIGINAL EVIDENCE

Studies & sources

Trace a statement back to its paper, guideline or source document. Read beyond the headline.

06 · RISK

Safety & interactions

Check documented harms, treatment interactions and the details that can change a decision.

What makes a record trustworthy?

Every record connects an approach to a defined clinical question. Evidence descriptions sit alongside the population, study design, limitations, safety notes and sources. A positive result for one symptom does not establish that an approach treats cancer.

Read our evidence standards, coverage and review status →

Two ways to use the collection

For people affected by cancer
Begin with a symptom or diagnosis. Open the full record, note whether the study matches your situation, and take its safety questions to your oncology team.

For researchers and critical readers
Begin with a clinical question. Trace the original source, check the comparator and primary endpoint, examine effect size and uncertainty, and look for conflicting results.

Start Here: a practical guide to data analysis and critical scientific thinking →

New in the repository

Sixteen source-linked briefs extend the collection into commonly searched natural-product claims, supportive care and documented risks.

Follow the evidence, including when it disappoints

A defined cancer outcome

Exercise after colon cancer

Read a randomized trial in its specific setting, with recurrence and survival outcomes clearly identified.

A supportive-care question

American ginseng for fatigue

Check the primary endpoint, the later time point and how guidance weighs the evidence.

A negative finding matters

Vitamin B6 for hand–foot syndrome

A plausible idea can fail in clinical testing. Keep negative results and harms in view.

What does “natural” mean in this collection?

The scope includes plant-derived products, nutrients, diets, exercise, mind–body practices and supportive physical care. Some records cover clinical devices or conventional comparators; their families are labeled in the index. Origin alone does not establish effectiveness or safety.

Does an entry mean an approach works or cures cancer?

No. Inclusion means there is a question to examine. The collection includes supportive findings, mixed or negative results, investigational approaches and evidence of harm. Cure claims require appropriate human evidence; laboratory activity and symptom improvement answer different questions.

Explore cancer-control research and cure claims →

How complete is this repository?

The first structured release was compiled October 11, 2026. The repository now indexes 33 existing Missing Script reviews and 56 dedicated evidence briefs (89 records total). The 328 deduplicated source links are supporting references, not a count of distinct clinical trials. Existing citations have been indexed; they have not all received a fresh independent appraisal.

Our goal is to build one of the most useful, transparent repositories of evidence on natural approaches. Current coverage is selective. Dated literature-search and repository maintenance began October 13, 2026. Verified additions and revisions will carry source-check dates; unresolved findings will be held for further checking. This process does not provide comprehensive interaction checking or formal independent clinical sign-off.

See the current coverage and editorial standards →

Use evidence to ask better questions. This resource supports research and conversations with qualified clinicians. It does not provide a personal treatment plan. Review supplements, restrictive diets and other interventions with your oncology team before changing care.

Browse the evidence · Check the sources · Understand the standards

Evidence Updates

See the dated record of new entries, revisions, safety changes and coverage limits on the Evidence Updates page.

Added October 14, 2026

Ten new clinical-question records broaden the nutrition, supportive-care and cancer-control coverage. Three records document important null cancer-control findings, and the high-dose vitamin D record transparently places the new phase III result beside the earlier phase II signal.

Added October 15, 2026

Ten botanical and nutraceutical clinical-question records add negative, mixed, positive and harmful findings. The strongest safety signal is the stopped GENIUS phase III trial of Goshajinkigan, where grade 2 or worse oxaliplatin neuropathy was more frequent with the Kampo formula.

Exercise and rehabilitation additions — October 16, 2026

Ten records add functional, cognitive, sleep and cancer-control questions. The collection keeps improvements in symptoms or fitness separate from tumor response.

Added October 17, 2026

Ten structured mind–body, sleep, and psychosocial supportive-care questions were added after primary-source and duplication checks. None is evidence of tumor control.

New evidence records · October 18, 2026

Ten supportive-care records were added. These additions include positive, mixed and negative primary outcomes; none tested tumor response, recurrence or survival.

See the dated Evidence Updates log →

Added October 19, 2026

Ten new records deepen the interaction and unsupported-cure-claim rotation. The repository now contains 109 published records and 394 distinct source links.